Netflix reverses course on password sharing: What you need to know


Written by:

Sharing Isn’t Caring

In 2017, Netflix (NFLX) infamously tweeted, “Love is sharing a password.” But the company has since changed its stance on passwords, if not love. Now, its long-announced plans to crack down on accounts that share passwords across multiple people are finally coming to fruition.

For years, Netflix prioritized user growth as its main metric of success. However, following a trend across the streaming industry, it recently pivoted away from growth to prioritize profitability. Eliminating password sharing seems to be the clearest path forward. The company estimates that more than 100 million households currently share a password.

In the eyes of Netflix, these unauthorized users each represent a potential monthly subscription. If 100 million users signed up for its cheapest ad-free plan at $9.99, this strategy could tack on an extra $1 billion in monthly income.

What Are the Rules?

Under the new policy, Netflix accounts will still be shareable, but only within a single, physical household. Each user on an account will need to sign into the home’s wifi every 31 days in order to continue using it.

To enforce this, Netflix plans to institute a device verification system, using IP addresses and account activity to keep track of which devices are part of which household. If a device that isn’t connected to the primary user’s home network logs into an account, it will get flagged. If you’re traveling, you’ll have to request a temporary code to get remote access for one week.

Netflix has stated that it will not automatically charge accounts it flags for password sharing. Instead, it will simply block access. However, in other countries like Peru and Chile, Netflix already charges a small fee for “subaccounts” and therefore it would not be entirely surprising to see their US strategy shift again down the line.

Benefits vs. Backlash

For Netflix, the potential benefit of limiting password sharing is huge. It could boost revenue massively without the need to add new customers. However, the longtime streaming leader will also need to prepare for the potential pushback that could follow this rule change.

For example, some families may simply not find Netflix valuable enough to pay for multiple accounts and decide to cancel altogether. Meanwhile, the popularity of its competitors who do allow password sharing may rise. Finally, hackers could find a way to skirt Netflix’s rules, eventually.

The success of this password-sharing crackdown — or the lack thereof — is sure to have ripple effects across the streaming industry for years to come. With that in mind, like so much of the content to come from Netflix’s legendary run, this is a story that you’ll want to keep your eye on.

Learn More:

This article originally appeared on and was syndicated by

Please understand that this information provided is general in nature and shouldn’t be construed as a recommendation or solicitation of any products offered by SoFi’s affiliates and subsidiaries. In addition, this information is by no means meant to provide investment or financial advice, nor is it intended to serve as the basis for any investment decision or recommendation to buy or sell any asset. Keep in mind that investing involves risk, and past performance of an asset never guarantees future results or returns. It’s important for investors to consider their specific financial needs, goals, and risk profile before making an investment decision.
The information and analysis provided through hyperlinks to third party websites, while believed to be accurate, cannot be guaranteed by SoFi. These links are provided for informational purposes and should not be viewed as an endorsement. No brands or products mentioned are affiliated with SoFi, nor do they endorse or sponsor this content.
Communication of SoFi Wealth LLC an SEC Registered Investment Advisor
SoFi isn’t recommending and is not affiliated with the brands or companies displayed. Brands displayed neither endorse or sponsor this article. Third party trademarks and service marks referenced are property of their respective owners.

More from MediaFeed:

12 of the worst movies on Netflix

12 of the worst movies on Netflix

When it comes to movies, I will watch almost anything that pops up on Netflix. I work in the film industry, I know how much work goes into producing a project, but I also know that sometimes you’re saddled with a flop, and no amount of hard work will fix that.

As a rule of thumb, I give most movies I watch the benefit of the doubt. Every film I watch starts at a ten, and I deduct points as I watch it. Bad acting? Weird casting choices? Terrible plotlines? Deduct, deduct, deduct.

This list of 12 of the worst movies on Netflix is by no means telling you that your favorite comfort movie is bad. If one of these movies happens to be your favorite, more power to you! We all have different reasons for why movies hit us in all the right spots. But these movies were just too bad or downright cringey to land on my own list.

wutwhanfoto / istockphoto

There’s been a new trend for Netflix (and other studios) to adapt fanfiction into major motion pictures in recent years. “After” is one of those projects. The film is based on a One Direction story published on Wattpad that is essentially a reader-proxy character who falls in love with Harry Styles, or Hardin Scott, as he was later renamed for publication purposes.

Now, this movie is not bad because it’s fanfiction. I am all about incredible authors getting their fanworks turned into major publishing deals and movies with their favorite actors in the roles. This movie is bad because it glorifies a really toxic relationship. Hardin is a terrible boyfriend; he’s angry, violent and verbally abusive when things don’t go his way.

kasinv / istockphoto

It should really come as no surprise that the follow-up to “After” is also on this list. If people were on the fence about whether “After” was toxic, “After We Collided” assured audiences that it was, in fact, a very toxic relationship. There’s nothing romantic or feel-good about watching an alcoholic boy verbally abusing the girl he claims to love.

There’s also a sub-plot where Tessa (the main protagonist) discovers that her mother is dating her ex-boyfriend, which is just all-around yikes-worthy. There are many incredible works of fanfiction that deserve their chance on the silver screen, and films like “After” and “After We Collided” are not it.


“The Kissing Booth” movies are nowhere near as egregiously bad as the “After” series, but they’re still not exactly good either. These movies are yet another example of Wattpad-to-Netflix projects, and unfortunately, it features an unhealthy dose of toxic masculinity and a violent male love interest.

Despite being an unmitigated mess of a movie, audiences seemed to enjoy the overwrought cliches and cheesy teenage romance on display in the film. Even I’m willing to admit that it had a few okay moments, but the bad outweighs the good.

Three years later and I still have no idea why they over-sexualized Elle, why they chose to have Noah be so controlling, and why they absolutely failed to address sexual assault appropriately.


Much like the sequel to “After,” the second “Kissing Booth” doesn’t exactly improve the glaring issues from the one that came before. Seriously, what parents would let their teenagers spend the summer alone in a beach house? I understand it’s a work of fiction, but what?

I had serious issues with the sub-plots to get Elle undressed in the first movie, and “Kissing Booth 2” carried on the tradition of coming up with the weirdest reasons for her to be barely dressed throughout the movie.

Unfortunately, Noah is just as manipulative and controlling as he was in the first film, and he lightly mocks Elle’s assault from the first film, and there are zero ramifications. Overall, “The Kissing Booth” movies are bad because they glorify all the wrong things for their target audiences.


Netflix really did try to give us a shiny new action film to rally around this year, but in the end, the mindless action just created a fairly lackluster film. The film has a spectacular cast with Anthony Mackie in the lead, but he really deserved better than this film. 

Set in the near-future year 2036, drones and robot soldiers fight wars. The bad moments far outweigh the interesting and good parts of the film.

If you want to sacrifice your time to robot soldiers and action sequences, “Terminator” is right there. I’m sure “Outside the Wire” found its target audience, but it’s just not a great film if you aren’t that target audience.


I am still disappointed by this film. Tom Holland, Robert Pattinson, Sebastian Stan, Mia Wasikowska? That sounds like a recipe for success, but ultimately it was a recipe for disaster. The plot is a mess, the characters are unlikable, and it’s two-and-a-half hours of your life you don’t want to sacrifice willingly.

There are many great storylines, but they’re often rushed, poorly paced, and at best incoherent to the other elements of the film. I really rooted for this film to be a hit, but it was a swing and a miss for everyone involved. One day, I hope Tom Holland finds his way into a non-Marvel film that is actually good and doesn’t involve the brutal death of a dog.


Netflix has a really robust collection of foreign language films that are high on my must-watch list, but “Oh, Ramona!” isn’t one of them, unfortunately. This Romanian coming-of-age teen comedy could have been an entertaining movie, but if it weren’t for the glaringly awful victim-blaming, homophobia, fatphobia, and objectification of women that permeates the entire film.

I always try to be cognizant that I view things through an American-lense, but I was led to believe that the use of “r*tard” and homophobic rhetoric is largely frowned upon in most areas, especially if the film had plans to release across the world. Despite being directed by a woman, the film is wholly centered around the male gaze.

wutwhanfoto / istockphoto

I am a huge fan of the Mötley Crüe and a long-time fan of Douglas Booth’s work, so of course, I was quick to watch “The Dirt” when it landed on Netflix. I was left feeling that it was just “OK.” It’s not a terrible film, but it does fall into many of the same perils and pitfalls of other band biopics. Maybe we’ve seen enough of sex, drugs and rock’n’roll to last a lifetime.

The 80s aesthetics are great, but the excessive amounts of bad behavior on display doesn’t really offer anything to the plot. If you like the band, you might actually enjoy spending awhile with the film, but if you’re just in it to watch a fun biopic about musicians, go watch “Rocketman.”


“The Cloverfield Paradox” feels like a film intended to be released in theaters, but someone realized it was too bad to attempt a theatrical run, so they quietly pitched it to Netflix. 

It’s been three years, and I’m still not entirely sure what I watched in 2018 and why anyone gave this mess the greenlight. Maybe part of the issue is because the script wasn’t originally part of the Cloverfield universe, and J.J. Abrams thought it could be adapted into the world.

The movie has an outstanding cast (Elizabeth Debicki, Gugu Mbatha-Raw and David Oyelowo), but even they can’t salvage an outstandingly bad film. There are plenty of better sci-fi films to devote your time to on Netflix.


This film is essentially “if Paul Blart, Mall Cop were an international assassin.” Do with that comparison what you will. If you love anything Kevin James is in, then you’ll probably find yourself enraptured with the specific brand of comedy in this film, but I was left thoroughly unimpressed. 

The humor is weak, the politics are dodgy, and the overall execution of the film leaves an overtly cringey feeling as the credits roll.

If you just want something to have on in the background on a Saturday afternoon, you could do better, but “True Memoirs of an International Assassin” isn’t the worst film you could pick to watch.


To follow up, the hit-and-miss Kevin James film here is a truly terrible film with David Spade at the forefront. Another funny-man who has struck out more than he’s hit home runs. In fact, Rotten Tomatoes critics gave it a resounding 0%, which is rough.

The handful of genuinely humorous moments in “Father of the Year” are not worth the abysmal humor throughout the film. This is one-and-a-half hours you can do better with. Literally any other comedy on Netflix is going to be better than this film.


I am still not sure why, a year after the critical success of “A Quiet Place,” anyone decided to create a horror film where the central plot centered around a world under attack by creatures who hunt by sound. It’s essentially the same concept, just poorly handled. This isn’t very reassuring, considering “The Silence” features Stanley Tucci and Kiernan Shipka.

Look, if you love horror films and you’re looking for a new one to watch on Netflix, you may end up a fan of “The Silence.” But overall, it’s painfully boring and offers no real meat for the charismatic cast to work with.


As with anything, your taste in movies may not align with my taste in movies. In fact, I may have named your favorite film as one of the worst movies on Netflix. 

But I tried to approach each of the films on this list, hoping that I would be watching a terrific film. I work in the film industry. I know how much work goes into producing a project, but I also know that sometimes you’re saddled with a flop, and no amount of hard work will fix that.

Wondering which Netflix Original Series we found disappointing? Check out Your Money Geek’s list of Netflix Original Series flops.

This article
originally appeared on 
YourMoneyGeek.comand was
syndicated by

kasinv / istockphoto

Featured Image Credit: wutwhanfoto / istockphoto.