How 80s TV shows ignored sweatshop labor and global ethics
Sweatshop labor and the lack of concern or transparency about global labor practices were not a common, explicit topic in the main storylines of major U.S. 1980s primetime TV shows, which tended to focus more on aspirational lifestyles, police procedurals, family dynamics, and the celebration of wealth that characterized the Reagan era. The television landscape of the decade largely avoided examining where products came from, under what conditions they were manufactured, or what ethical costs accompanied the consumer goods that characters displayed and desired. This absence reflected broader cultural attitudes of the 1980s, when globalization was accelerating, manufacturing was moving overseas, and American consumers were increasingly purchasing imported goods without questioning the labor conditions behind them. However, examining 80s television reveals both rare exceptions that touched on labor issues and the more common implicit reinforcement of consumption without consideration of production ethics.
Roseanne: Working-class realism and domestic labor struggles
Roseanne, which premiered in 1988 at the very end of the decade, became known for its working-class realism that stood in stark contrast to the wealth-obsessed programming that dominated 80s television. As The Guardian observed, “since it began in the late 1980s, Roseanne has presented a tough yet tenderhearted image of the white midwestern working class. The Conners may not have had money or power, but they were presented as complete people, rather than simply stereotypes.” Roseanne Conner’s job at a plastic utensil factory and her various low-wage service jobs highlighted issues of American labor, including wages, workplace conditions, and union involvement or lack thereof. These roles provided a domestic, working-class counterpoint to the decade’s general celebration of wealth and consumerism. While not focusing specifically on global sweatshops or international labor exploitation, the factory setting and the constant struggle for fair wages were recurring themes that highlighted labor issues in general and the challenges facing working-class Americans.
Dallas: Oil wealth and conspicuous consumption
Dallas epitomized 1980s television’s celebration of extreme wealth and luxury, with the Ewing family’s oil empire providing the backdrop for storylines focused on power, betrayal, and conspicuous consumption. The show heavily featured designer clothes, expensive jewelry, luxury cars, and opulent mansions, creating an aspirational viewing that celebrated material success without any consideration of how products were manufactured or under what conditions. Characters wore expensive clothing and accessories without acknowledging global supply chains, labor practices, or ethical sourcing. This reflects the broader cultural attitude that consumption was purely about status and pleasure rather than having any moral dimension. The show’s focus on acquiring and displaying wealth reinforced a culture where the origin of products was invisible and irrelevant to their value or desirability.
Dynasty: Glamour without accountability
Dynasty took conspicuous consumption even further than Dallas, with the Carrington family’s fashion-forward wardrobe and extravagant lifestyle becoming central to the show’s appeal. The program featured elaborate designer wardrobes, particularly the shoulder-padded power suits and evening gowns that became iconic symbols of 80s excess, without ever addressing where these clothes came from or how they were produced. The constant visual display of high-end consumer goods implicitly reinforced a culture where the purchase and possession of luxury items were essential and aspirational. In contrast, the source of those goods remained entirely invisible for both characters and viewers. Dynasty’s glamorous presentation of wealth and consumption represented the decade’s general attitude that shopping and display were forms of entertainment and self-expression rather than activities with ethical dimensions or global implications that deserved consideration or transparency.
Conclusion
The general avoidance of sweatshop labor and global production ethics in the 1980s television landscape reflected broader cultural attitudes that prioritized consumption and wealth display over consideration of how goods were produced. Roseanne’s rare examination of domestic labor struggles stood out precisely because it was so uncommon. In contrast, dominant shows like Dallas and Dynasty celebrated consumerism without questioning its human costs, creating a television culture that made labor invisible while making consumption aspirational and desirable.
Related:
- A nostalgic look back at classic Boomer-era TV shows
- Drama TV character deaths we’ll never, ever get over
Like MediaFeed’s content? Be sure to follow us.
This article was syndicated by MediaFeed.org.
AlertMe
